Righteous anger is based on facts and pursues righteous judgment !!!
Obama’s Attorney General Loretta Lynch said last week after her clandestine meeting with Bill Clinton that she would “accept the FBI’s recommendation” regarding its investigation of Hillary Clinton’s unlawful use of a private server for transmitting and receiving government communications. So, what did Lynch mean with her use of the word “accept”? A “recommendation” does not dismiss her duty to uphold the rule of law. And now that the FBI has presented its “recommendation,” (i.e., “no charges are appropriate in this case” and also “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case”), will Lynch not “bring such a case” even though the “recommendation” is obviously a bold-faced lie and also a gross violation of the Supreme Law of the Land?
18 U.S.C., Section 793(f) states:
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document…relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer, Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
The FBI’s recommendation that no charges be brought against Hillary Clinton is based entirely on the FBI’s opinion that she did not intend to harm our country. However the facts (truth) and her numerous lies reveal the very opposite. With her forty years of experience in government Hillary Clinton without a doubt knew she was endangering our national security: No reasonable person doing what she was doing would not know that such actions harm our country. Nevertheless, nowhere within 18 U.S.C., Section 793(f) is it written or implied that intent is a requirement to bring charges.
She in fact went through the stop sign over a hundred times and repeatedly lied about doing so.
So, what are We the People as a whole or as individuals, to do if Loretta Lynch does not present the facts to a grand jury to indict Hillary Clinton?
If Loretta Lynch does not pursue the prosecution of Hillary Clinton, are we to simply grin and bear their obvious and willful violations of the rule of law?
What are the people to do when so-called “public officers” at the highest levels of “government” willfully violate the rule of law and other “public officers” in the chain of command conspire with them to shield them from prosecution?
What do we do when we see their consistent design (intent) to reduce us under absolute despotism? Are we to accept the shackles they are putting on us?
Is there no consequence for their willful violations of their oaths of office?
When no one in the “government” supports and defends the rule of law, are we to do nothing, or is every United States citizen also in the chain of command? Does each one of us have the right and duty to defend our Republic?
The answer to these questions is clearly established in our Natural God Given Rights to Self-defense, in the Declaration of Independence of the United States and in the Constitution of the United States. We are fifty states ruled by law, or at least we were.
Each United States citizen has the right and the duty to defend himself/herself and our Republic against tyranny, to remove those who have a design to reduce us under absolute despotism, and to remove them by whatever means necessary. That is why our Founders included the 2nd Amendment in our Constitution.
Christian American Patriots Militia