It is the responsibility (duty) of each member of Congress to determine prior to an election whether candidates for the Office of President are constitutionally qualified (eligible) and if ineligible to formally announce to the American voters his/her ineligibility. It is also the duty of each member of Congress who knows that a “candidate” for the Office of President is ineligible to openly challenge the candidate’s election while the electoral votes are being counted and Congress is to resolve the conflict prior to a candidate assuming the Office of President. But the facts clearly reveal that numerous members of this “Congress” willfully violated their duty prior to and after Americans voted for Obama, not only once, but twice: They knew in 2008 and in 2012 that Obama was ineligible to assume the Office of President, but not one of them informed the voters, not during the elections nor while they were counting the electoral votes in 2008 and 2012. It is no wonder that Obamacare is unconstitutional, i.e., with a fraud in our White House We will also have unconstitutional “laws” enacted in our Congress.
Numerous members of “Congress,” all the officers in this “administration” and all the justices in the “Supreme Court” have in fact been refusing to support and defend our Constitution (willfully violating our highest and foremost security measures)—refusing to honor their commitments to the American people.
Our Constitution requires that a child be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States to one day be eligible to be President. The American people have numerous reasons not to trust this government any longer. We now know that the birth certificate Barack Obama presented before the 2012 election is false. But the main reason we do not trust this government any longer is that they did not inform the American voters that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen,” even though the government knew this as far back as 2007.
Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is very clearly seen in the words “natural born Citizen” as they are contrasted by the grandfather clause that was intended for George Washington and his generation, i.e., “or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution.” George Washington was our first President, but not a “natural born citizen.” He was not born to American Citizens, nor was he born within the jurisdiction of the United States. He became a Citizen upon the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776 and it was only for this reason that the exception was made in the grandfather clause, as seen below:
Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Having fought hard for Independence from the British, it was very obvious that Washington and others in his generation had 100% allegiance to the country. But they did not trust that those born after them would have 100% allegiance, and, therefore, they decided to define “natural born Citizen” by contrasting it to themselves as follows:
1. One born to two American Citizens. 2. One born within the jurisdiction of the United States.
The grandfather clause made it possible for George Washington and others in his generation who had not been Citizens until the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, whose parents had not been Citizens, and who were not born in the jurisidiction of the United States, to be eligible to assume the office of President. It is by contrast to George Washington and others that our Constitution defines “natural born Citizen” as 100% allegiance and thus exposes Barack Obama as Constitutionally ineligible and illegitimate, i.e., he is illegitimate because he, by Constitutional definition, has allegiance elsewhere.
The U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett (1874) very clearly decided that without doubt a “natural born Citizen” is a child born in a country of parents who were citizens also. The Court decided in 1874 as follows:
“It was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.” [boldface added]
NOTE: The framers of our Constitution did not want any “doubts” about the allegiance of future presidents. They very clearly required 100% allegiance and so defined “natural born Citizen” by sharply contrasting it to themselves. The framers of our Constitution obviously lacked the qualifications they required for future presidents and thus had to write the grandfather clause additionally.
Our Constitution’s definition for “natural born Citizen” is also seen in the fact that our founding fathers, (i.e., the authors of our Constitution), directly applied Emerich de Vattel’s principles of natural law which they all read in his classic, The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns. The Law of Nations, was written in 1758 and translated from French into English in 1760.
Swiss editor Charles W. F. Dumas sent Benjamin Franklin three original French copies of de Vattel’s Le droit des gens (The Law of Nations). Franklin presented one of the copies to the Library Company of Philadelphia. On December 9, 1775, Franklin thanked Dumas: 
“…. I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the Law of Nations. Accordingly that copy, which I kept, (after depositing one in our own public library here, and sending the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed), has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author…” (2nd para) [boldface added]
NOTE: It is interesting that Franklin so clearly wrote that the copy of the classic by Vattel he kept “has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress now sitting.” Franklin’s statement cannot be reasonably ignored by those who prefer not to acknowledge the truth. The Law of Nations has also been described as “unrivaled among such treatises in its influence on the American founders” and was thereafter “pounced upon by studious members of Congress, groping their way without the light of precedents.”
Are Obama and those committing fraud with him harming Americans individually and collectively? Yes: Absolutely! They are abusing us! Why is an illegitimate “government” harmful? Because they conspire against the ordered society (rule of law) established by our founding fathers in our Constitution: They disrespect us, do not protect us—attacking our Constitutional Republic—usurping our Sovereignty in the false name of “security,“ in fact only attempting to enslave us, i.e., enslave Freedom.
NOTE: “The legal analysis before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary of the question of whether Senator John McCain was a natural born citizen eligible to hold the office of President” appears to have served its purpose. The fact, however, is that the “question” has not been legally resolved. As Snopes.com says, the “question” as to whether McCain is eligible to assume the office of President is still “undetermined”.
Ask yourself why John McCain is so friendly to Obama, but attacking Rand Paul for genuinely defending the rights (lives) of American Citizens? It’s because, although McCain got the short end of the stick, and no doubt he is upset about that, he and Obama made a pact to scratch one another’s backs — and McCain attacked Rand Paul knowing full and well that Obama was not eligible to assume the office of President (is illegitimate). This is clear because he did not stand with Rand Paul in defense of Americans Citizens, (i.e., instead of acknowledging that our Rights define us, Individually and Collectively, that We the People are the country, that We are Sovereign, and that our Rights are are the foremost security measures to protect the country, McCain denounced all of Rand Paul’s demands that were made on behalf of the American People—traitorously and falsely accusing Rand Paul of doing a “disservice” to the country. McCain apparently does not want to acknowledge that he is not our king.
Our founding fathers knew the dangers ahead: They knew there would be vain and aspiring men/women (those who have no intention of serving the people) seeking to possess the highest seats in our government.
The American people have many very experienced Patriots with expertise in many different areas. We have been watching and know what has to be done and done very soon – “to prevent our country’s ruin.”
A person who lies to the American people or commits fraud on the American people and all who aid him/her in lying to the people and fraudulently entering into our White House are in fact trespassers: They do not have lawful authority.
Obama, Clinton and others in this rogue and illegitimate government murdered of Americans in Benghazi and are attempting to cover their involvement to avoid accountability. If this “Congress” does not hold Obama, Clinton and others in this “administration” accountable, then each member of “Congress” that does not act to do so will also be held accountable for these murders and cover-up which no doubt contributed to the fraudulent election in 2012.
This post is in progress. Please check back for additional content.