It is the responsibility (duty) of each member of Congress to determine prior to an election whether candidates for the Office of President are constitutionally qualified (eligible) and if ineligible to formally announce to the American voters his/her ineligibility. It is also the duty of each member of Congress who knows that a “candidate” for the Office of President is ineligible to openly challenge the candidate’s election while the electoral votes are being counted and Congress is to resolve the conflict prior to a candidate assuming the Office of President. But the facts clearly reveal that numerous members of this “Congress” willfully violated their duty prior to and after Americans voted for Obama, not only once, but twice: They knew in 2008 and in 2012 that Obama was ineligible to assume the Office of President, but not one of them informed the voters, not during the elections nor while they were counting the electoral votes in 2008 and 2012. It is no wonder that Obamacare is unconstitutional, i.e., with a fraud in our White House We will also have unconstitutional “laws” enacted in our Congress.
Numerous members of “Congress,” all the officers in this “administration” and all the justices in the “Supreme Court” have in fact been refusing to support and defend our Constitution (willfully violating our highest and foremost security measures)—refusing to honor their commitments to the American people.
Our Constitution requires that a child be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States to one day be eligible to be President. The American people have numerous reasons not to trust this government any longer. We now know that the birth certificate Barack Obama presented before the 2012 election is false. But the main reason we do not trust this government any longer is that they did not inform the American voters that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen,” even though the government knew this as far back as 2007.
Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is very clearly seen in the words “natural born Citizen” as they are contrasted by the grandfather clause that was intended for George Washington and his generation, i.e., “or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution.” George Washington was our first President, but not a “natural born citizen.” He was not born to American Citizens, nor was he born within the jurisdiction of the United States. He became a Citizen upon the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776 and it was only for this reason that the exception was made in the grandfather clause, as seen below:
Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Having fought hard for Independence from the British, it was very obvious that Washington and others in his generation had 100% allegiance to the country. But they did not trust that those born after them would have 100% allegiance, and, therefore, they decided to define “natural born Citizen” by contrasting it to themselves as follows:
1. One born to two American Citizens. 2. One born within the jurisdiction of the United States.
The grandfather clause made it possible for George Washington and others in his generation who had not been Citizens until the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, whose parents had not been Citizens, and who were not born in the jurisidiction of the United States, to be eligible to assume the office of President. It is by contrast to George Washington and others that our Constitution defines “natural born Citizen” as 100% allegiance and thus exposes Barack Obama as Constitutionally ineligible and illegitimate, i.e., he is illegitimate because he, by Constitutional definition, has allegiance elsewhere.
The U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett (1874) very clearly decided that without doubt a “natural born Citizen” is a child born in a country of parents who were citizens also. The Court decided in 1874 as follows:
“It was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.” [boldface added]
NOTE: The framers of our Constitution did not want any “doubts” about the allegiance of future presidents. They very clearly required 100% allegiance and so defined “natural born Citizen” by sharply contrasting it to themselves. The framers of our Constitution obviously lacked the qualifications they required for future presidents and thus had to write the grandfather clause additionally.
Our Constitution’s definition for “natural born Citizen” is also seen in the fact that our founding fathers, (i.e., the authors of our Constitution), directly applied Emerich de Vattel’s principles of natural law which they all read in his classic, The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns. The Law of Nations, was written in 1758 and translated from French into English in 1760.
Swiss editor Charles W. F. Dumas sent Benjamin Franklin three original French copies of de Vattel’s Le droit des gens (The Law of Nations). Franklin presented one of the copies to the Library Company of Philadelphia. On December 9, 1775, Franklin thanked Dumas: 
“…. I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the Law of Nations. Accordingly that copy, which I kept, (after depositing one in our own public library here, and sending the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed), has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author…” (2nd para) [boldface added]
NOTE: It is interesting that Franklin so clearly wrote that the copy of the classic by Vattel he kept “has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress now sitting.” Franklin’s statement cannot be reasonably ignored by those who prefer not to acknowledge the truth. The Law of Nations has also been described as “unrivaled among such treatises in its influence on the American founders” and was thereafter “pounced upon by studious members of Congress, groping their way without the light of precedents.”
Obama studied Constitutional Law at Harvard and was therefore well acquainted with Vattel’s classic The Law of Nations, and he must have known of its influence on the framers of our Constitution and their intent in these foremost eligibility requirements for the Presidency. But even though Obama co-sponsored Senate Resolution 511 and it specifically refers to these Constitutional requirements, Obama proceeded to campaign for the Presidency knowing that he was ineligible to be the President. A candidate who knew that he or she was ineligible to be President and campaigned for the Office of President without informing the voters commits fraud.
And Obama’s “political party,” his “administrative staff,” “senators” and “representatives” in “Congress,” “justices” in the “Supreme Court,” and “judges” in other courts who know that Obama is ineligible, commit fraud against the people on a daily basis—disrespecting the American People.