Gallery

The “political and legal elites” use “emergency laws” to enslave us, not protect the “Homeland” — worse than Hitler with his Reichstag Fire Decree

Reichstag Fire Decree

Last Tuesday, February 26th, five “justices” in our U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Fourth Amendment to our U.S. Constitution by unlawfully eliminating legal recourse against the government — five individuals claiming to “amend” our Constitution — and they are doing this with the false claim “to defend the Homeland,” i.e., to retain the U.S. Department of Homeland Security,  Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and FISA Amendments Act of 2008. This is what Adolf Hitler did when he made his Reichstag Fire Decree, but Hitler at least followed Germany’s laws, (i.e., Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution), to temporarily suspend constitutional guarantees, whereas the “political and legal elites” in U.S.A. are willfully violating and alienating our Constitution—using  their emergency laws to unlawfully and permanently eliminate our rights.

NOTE: Adolf Hitler never formally revoked the constitutional guarantees of the Weimar Constitution — used an “emergency” (“terror”) to temporarily suspend constitutional rights, (i.e., temporarily set the Constitution aside), whereas the “political and legal elites” in U.S.A. are using the attack of 9/11, the Department of Homeland Security and their “emergency laws” to permanently eliminate our rights — not temporarily — permanently revoking our constitutional guarantees. Andrew Napolitano wrote last December regarding the Fourth Amendment:

“The right to privacy is a natural human right. Its enshrinement in the Constitution has largely kept America from becoming East Germany.”

We know what Hitler did after declaring “emergency laws” legally. What are we to expect from the “political and legal elites” in the U.S.A. which are declaring their “emergency laws” illegally?

Reichstag and World Trade Center

Reichstag fire and attack on the World trade Center

The U. S. Supreme Court is required by law to uphold our U.S. Constitution and to let us (the American people) to know that to retain the “U.S. Department of Homeland Security” and “emergency laws” we must amend our Constitution. But five corrupt “justices” did not do so. Their names are Samuel Alito, John Roberts, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas. The four others, Justice Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor dissented the “ruling” and were correct to do so: Our rights bind all legislation and all court decisions in the same way that the basic rights bind all the legislation and court decisions in the Federal Republic of Germany. See the two protest signs held by the German women to your left — in the left column. Our human rights “binden Gesetzgebung” and “binden Rechtsprechung.”

NOTE: “Political and legal elites” in the Federal Republic of Germany have been willfully violating and alienating all the basic rights (human rights) in Germany, (i.e., willfully violating the entire German Basic Law), since 1968. In fact they have been committing fraud on the people for over forty-five years (doing as East Germany did), and the same as the Arab dictators have been doing, and for the same length of time. There seems to be a connection.

When did these willful (arrogant) violations of our U.S. Constitution begin?

After World War II President Truman and Congress put the “black budget” in place in arrogant violation of the U.S. Constitution. A report by Michael E. Salla, Phd. states as follows:

“In 1947, Congress, in the National Security Act, created the National Security Council, the Central Intelligence Organization (CIA) and consolidated the US military into one entity, Department of Defense (DoD). One of the issues that remained unresolved from the creation and operation of the CIA was the extent to which its budget and intelligence activities would remain a secret.

Therefore, Congress passed legislation approving the secrecy over the funding mechanisms used for the CIA and its intelligence related activities. The bill was passed with great haste and minimal debate causing considerable concern among those few Congressmen brave enough to openly challenge the constitutionality of the Act. [3] Congressman Emmanuel Celler of New York voted for the bill but protested: “If the members of the Armed Services Committee can hear the detailed information to support this bill, why cannot the entire membership? Are they the Brahmins and we the untouchables? Secrecy is the answer.” [4] Celler, like the majority of Congressmen, passed the CIA Act very much like the wealthy father viewed the birth of an illegitimate child, appropriate care would be taken to provide for the child, but there would be no official admission of patrimony and the responsibility that entails.”

Some years later a federal court dismissed a case where a citizen complained that the black budget was a violation of Article 1, section 9, clause 7 of the U.S. Constitution and his rights to know where his taxes were being spent. The court quickly dismissed the case by “deciding” that the plaintiff had not alleged harm and that the CIA’s use of the black Budget had not caused the plaintiff harm. President Truman, Congress and the federal court, (i.e., executive, legislative and judicative branches), in fact claimed to “justify” the black Budget (albeit in willful violation of the U.S. Constitution)—claiming that the black budget was “needed for secrecy” to fund the CIA and “protect our national security.” The U.S. Constitution states as follows:

Article 1, section 9, clause 7 U.S. Constitution                                No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.

The willful violation of the U.S. Constitution is an example that there is in fact no “separation of powers” when it comes to “political and legal elites” deciding to willfully violate and alienate the U.S. Constitution. All the three branches of government are not acting as separate powers, (i.e., not “checks and balance”), but the three branches are conspiring against the U.S. Constitution without the knowledge of the American people, i.e., conspiring against the American people.

And now we have President Obama’s “gun control” initiatives in front of us and a report that it will probably be the U.S. Supreme Court that “decides whether or not the restrictions of our rights to bear arms are legal. The fact is, however, that it is Obama (the executive) members of Congress (the legislative) and the U.S. Supreme Court (the judicative) that will all again conspire against the American peopole. Fellow Americans, in light of what the “judicative” branch has done in the past, we now have no reason to trust the U.S. Supreme Court, none whatsoever. The five justices did not suspend the Fourth Amendment to our U.S. Constitution last week, but unlawfully struck it down permanently. According to the U.S. Supreme Court the Fourth Amendment no longer exists. Hitler indefinitely suspended the provisions of the Weimar Constitution (set them aside under his desk), but the “political and legal elites” in U.S.A. have done far worse with their “emergency laws” (not our laws)—“ruling” that they have a “secret court” where our complaints are never to be heard: The words, “temporary emergency measure” are not part of the “ruling”.

In addition, the use of “secrecy” (including seizures and searches) are not being used only to monitor communications between Americans and parties outside the U.S.A., but between Americans inside the U.S.A. Neither is the “secrecy” only to monitor “terrorism,” but for all “crimes” in the U.S.A. and without the requirement for a court order. Fellow Americans, what is happening within the U.S.A. today is what Hitler did after declaring the Reichstag Fire Decree. It is also what has been taking place in Europe for many years. And in fact the “emergency laws” being used in Europe and U.S.A. today are exactly the same “emergency laws” that were used against the people in Tunesia, Lybia, Egypt, Syria and many Arab countries in the Middle East. These laws in fact violate all of the basic principles of democracy and cause civil unrest. They are the reason why the Arab peoples have been rising up in revolutions.

NOTE: It is interesting that our nation (U.S.A.) and other Western nations are in fact imprisoning 30,000 men in Saudi Arabia simply because they want to be free from the dictatorial rule of the Saud family, which has implemented the exact same “emergency laws”. In fact the Saud family has written unholy laws (supported by Western “elites”) prohibiting all protests. This is nothing more than the “political and legal elites” in U.S.A. and the European Union conspiring with dictatorships against many innocent people. Our “leaders” are in fact the criminals here, willfully and arrogantly violating all of the human rights that are listed in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, i.e., rights that they do not respect and think of as only ink on paper.

23 responses to “The “political and legal elites” use “emergency laws” to enslave us, not protect the “Homeland” — worse than Hitler with his Reichstag Fire Decree

  1. This angers me to no end , NO SIR I WILL NOT STAND DOWN SIR !

    Like this

  2. Pingback: Be prepared! There is no privacy anymore, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Fourth Amendment to our Constitution, and they also want your gun | ofthehighest

  3. Wow, amazing weblog structure! How lengthy have you ever been blogging for? you make blogging glance easy. The full glance of your site is excellent, as smartly as the content!

    Like this

  4. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  5. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  6. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  7. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  8. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  9. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  10. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  11. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  12. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  13. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  14. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  15. Pingback: Our Constitution’s definition of 100% allegiance is to protect us from enemy infiltration, and as such is a directly enforceable right of each Citizen to enjoy a legitimate government. Directly enforceable rights bind the executive, the legislature

  16. Pingback: Obama trespassing at the White House | ofthehighest

  17. Pingback: McCain and Obama scratch one another’s backs | ofthehighest

  18. Pingback: McCain and Obama scratch one another’s backs to the detriment of the American People | ofthehighest

  19. Pingback: Is the Democrat Party deliberately provoking us into a 2nd revolution and/or civil war so they can declare Martial law in an attempt to eliminate all opposition? Expect all out war on or after September 11, 2013 if Obama continues abusing Americans. | oft

  20. Pingback: Is the Democrat Party deliberately provoking us into a 2nd revolution and/or civil war so they can declare Martial law in an attempt to eliminate all opposition? Expect all out war on or after September 11, 2013 if Obama continues abusing Americans. | oft

  21. Pingback: Is the Democrat Party deliberately provoking us into a 2nd revolution and/or civil war so they can declare Martial law in an attempt to eliminate all opposition? Expect all out war on or after September 11, 2013 if Obama continues abusing Americans. | oft

  22. Pingback: FINAL WARNING | ofthehighest

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s