Truth is not necessarily what you believe, i.e., cannot be conformed to your opinion. Truth exists outside your knowledge and opinion and is a consistent pattern of facts. Without consistent truth you have nothing to rely upon. You can be … Continue reading
SOVEREIGNTY:
Germany's Basic Law (Grundgesetz--GG) says, "All state authority emanates from the people." The German people are the absolute authority in and of Germany, not the illegitimate government.
The German people exercise, by virtue of their Sovereignty, "this Basic Law," not by means of illegitimate authorities. The German people have been declaring "this Basic Law" since May 23, 1949.
Germany Defined:
Human rights ("the basic rights") are very clearly defined in "this Basic Law" as the very essence of Germany, i.e., "human rights" are "this Basic Law" and the true identity of the German people.
Human rights are the dignity of man and it is "the duty of all state authority" to protect it. State authority willfully violating and alienating human rights is, in fact, abusive and illegitimate.
Human rights, defined by the people as "directly enforceable law," are to be enforced against abusive authorities, i.e., against authorities that violate the Sovereignty of the German people.
The words "the constitutional order" are in Article 20 GG and require "all state authority" to act in accordance with the order that the German people have been proclaiming daily since May 23, 1949.
Human rights ("the basic rights") are "the constitutional order" of Articles 1, 20 paragraph (3) and 79 GG, i.e., are the democratic rule of law, the very existence and security of Germany.
Human rights are "the basic principles” seen in Articles 1, 20 and 79 GG. One of them is "All state authority" is exercised by means of three "separate" organs," not by the organs conspiring together.
The words "this Basic Law" are seen in Article 79 GG, and with Article 20 GG clearly specify that legislation that is not subject to "the constitutional order" of "this Basic Law" is not legislation.
-
Legislation, including an amendment of "this Basic Law," that is not subject to "the constitutional order" of "this Basic Law" is unconstitutional and, therefore, null and void from the beginning.
"The constitutional order" of "this Basic Law" and international treaties agreed to by the German people clearly define "state authority." "State authority" does not willfully violate "this Basic Law."
The Basic Principles:
Each organ of the government must acknowledge that Germany is a nation ruled by law, that "all state authority" emanates from the German people and is exercised by the German people.
As the absolute authority of Germany the German people require each one of the three organs of government to act separately as specified in Article 20 GG in order to have checks and balances.
Each of the three organs of government must respect and protect the dignity of man and acknowledge that this is the duty of "all state authority," including each and every government employee.
Each of the three organs of government must acknowledge that "human rights" ("basic rights") are the basis of Germany of peace and of justice throughout the world, as specified in Article 1 GG.
The German people require each of the organs of government to acknowledge all of the "human rights" ("basic rights") as "inviolable and inalienable," i.e., as "directly enforceable law."
Each of the three organs of government must acknowledge that each organ and each employee is strictly bound by the "human rights" ("basic rights"), as very clearly specified in Article 1 GG.
Each of the three organs of government must act in strict accordance with "the constitutional order" of "this Basic Law" specified in Article 20 paragraph (3) GG and each organ is bound by "the law."
Legal Obligations:
Germany is one of the Inner Six or simply The Six founding Member-States of several European communities, and Germany's "national authorities" are also bound by international treaties.
It is the duty of each of the three organs of Germany to uphold the rule of law in accordance with Germany's Basic Law and treaties, i.e., to act against organs which violate the rule of law.
-
The German people and other European nations require the European Court of Human Rights to act (decide) against illegitimate governments operating within these European communities.
The German people and other Member-States of the European Union (EU) require institutions acting on behalf of the EU to act against governments that willfully violate the rule of law.
- Watch videos at Vodpod.
-
The European Court of Human Rights is an international human rights court established by the ECHR as agreed to by the German people and forty-six other High Contracting Parties, i.e., nations.
The "rights and freedoms" agreed to in the ECHR are (as duplicates) the same "basic principles" defined in Articles 1 and 20 paragraph (3) GG, as specified in Article 79 GG, the eternity clause.
The Legal Procedure:
The procedure for "an effective remedy" in Article 13 ECHR is the procedure within "the constitutional order" of "this Basic Law." The European Court of Human Rights must uphold the procedure.
The German people and other Member- States of the ECHR require the European Court of Human Rights to uphold the provisions provided for in Germany's Basic Law ("this Basic Law") and ECHR.
The German people and others require the European Court of Human Rights to decide against "national authorities" that violate the provisions provided in Germany's Basic Law and the ECHR.
According to Articles 1 and 13 ECHR all of the "rights and freedoms" provided for in Section 1 of the ECHR are "inviolable and inalienable," as provided for within Articles 1 and 20 paragraph (3) GG.
Any court that claims to be the final jurisdiction, (i.e., the end of the road for human rights complaints filed against "national authorities"), knows that this procedure is "inviolable" and "inalienable".
There is absolutely no tolerance within the rule of law for a corrupt European Court of Human Rights, (i.e., no room for traitorous "judges"), nor for "judges" which have not learned how to read.
The same must be said for "judges" in the Bundesverfassungsgericht in Germany. The "judges" that think they are King must be fired. There is no room within democracy for illegitimate "judges".
- The European Union is also based upon human rights and "national authorities" of its Member-States and the European Court of Human Rights must implement these rights as "inviolable" EU law.
-
The economic and political security of the EU ("mutual collective security") relies on enforcement of human rights. "Public authorities" are not allowed to act arbitrarily---violating the law.
Without upholding (enforcing) human rights the EU has no credibility, i.e., is without honor, acting fraudulently and disrespecting the Sovereignty of each of its twenty-seven Member-States.
-
"Public authorities" that willfully and routinely violate the Rule of Law have no respect for the people and, therefore, have no respect for human rights. Their words are empty and hypocritical.
Human rights are the "basis" of these communities and without respect for the law these "public authorities" in Germany and EU institutions falsely represent democracy to the world.
-
Article 53 ECHR makes it very clear that no provision of "this Convention" permits Germany to limit or derogate from any of the human rights that are "ensured" under the laws of Germany.
Article 53 ECHR makes it very clear that this European Convention on Human Rights requires Germany to "secure" all of the rights that are "ensured" under Germany's laws.
Article 53 ECHR also specifies that no provision of "this Convention" permits Germany to limit or derogate from human rights that are "ensured" under any agreement to which it is a Party.
Article 57 ECHR also makes this very clear. No reservation of a provision of "this Convention" can be made when the laws that are "in force" in Germany are "in conformity" with the provision.
Germany has not made a reservation regarding Article 53 ECHR, because everyone knows Germany is obliged under the Rule of Law to "secure" the rights "ensured" under Germany's laws.
Germany's "national authorities" must enforce the provisions of Germany's laws that were "ensured" ("in force") and "in conformity" with provisions of "this Convention" before Germany signed it.
The economic and political security of the EU ("mutual collective security") relies on enforcement of human rights, and the "public authorities" must fulfill their obligations to enforce them.
-
"Public authorities" which do not follow the Rule of Law are implementing plans of their own---alienating the people and their rights---refusing "the people" a say in the government.
The Federal Republic of Germany is a "democratic and social Federal state." These words make it very clear that the people are to participate in decisions which effect their lives.
-
The Federal Republic of Germany is defined by "the constitutional order" of "this Basic Law". Willful violations of "this Basic Law" are nothing other than vicious attacks on Germany and others.
The German people specifically intend for "basic rights" as "directly enforceable law" and "the constitutional order" to secure their community from all state authority violating "this Basic Law."
Without enforcing "this Basic Law" and European Conference on Human Rights "public authorities" are not advancing "freedom," "peace" and "justice," but one unlawful supranational totalitarianism.
Happiness cannot be dictated by a totalitarian regime. The German and other European peoples must be free to have a say within the decision-making procedures which effect their lives.
The "basic principles" of freedom and democracy are established in the law (both local and international law). For "public authorities" to refuse to enforce the Rule of Law is to enslave the people.
-
According to Articles 1, 20, 24, 79 and 146 GG and Articles 1, 13, and 53 ECHR the "basic rights" (human rights) are "to secure a peaceful lasting order in Europe and among the nations of the world."
For this same reason the EU is obliged to enforce "basic rights" (human rights) provided for in the Treaty of Lisbon Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (provided by the EU).
Article 1 of the Treaty of Lisbon Charter of Fundamental Human Rights of the European Union very strongly reflects Article 1 GG. The "basic rights" of "this Basic Law" and Charter are the same.
The European Court of Human Rights claims that its "decision" cannot be appealed to any other body, i.e., claims there is no higher authority to enforce these human rights within Europe.
The European Court of Human Rights' claim is unfounded. Article 52 of the Treaty of Lisbon Charter says that court shall not prevent Union law providing more extensive protection, and does.
Articles 51 and 53 of the Charter oblige "public authorities" in Member-States to respect, implement, observe and apply rights and principles in accordance with Member States' respective Constitutions.
As a Member-State of the EU Germany's power is based on the "basic principles" of Articles 1 and 20 GG as identified in "the constitutional order" of "this Basic Law." Any other claim is totally unfounded.
-
According to Germany's Basic Law and the Charter, these rights are "inviolable" ("directly enforceable law") and the EU is thus obliged to enforce corresponding rights "as directly enforceable law."
The Treaty of Lisbon Charter requires the EU to enforce corresponding rights provided for by Member States' in their respective constitutions, also rights that are not provided for in the ECHR.
Violations of Articles 1, 20, 24, 79, and 146 GG are violations of the Treaty of Lisbon Charter, because they violate all the implementation of "Union law," i.e., violate Articles 1 and 51 of the Charter.
Violations of Articles 1, 20, 24, and 79 GG are also free-standing and separately actionable infringements of the Treaty of Lisbon Charter, made very clear by Article 52 paragraph 3 of the Charter.
The European Court of Human Rights is violating corresponding rights provided for in the Treaty of Lisbon Charter, thus the EU must provide more extensive protection to enforce these rights.
Germany's Basic Law and the Treaty of Lisbon Charter both guarantee human rights as being "inviolable". This is very clearly seen in both Article 1 GG and Article 1 of the Treaty of Lisbon Charter.
"The constitutional order" of "this Basic Law" and this ECHR specifically require that all these "basic rights" be enforced. Obviously, they are not enforced, so this "social and Federal state" is not secured.
-
According to Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 20, 79, and 93 GG "all persons are equal before the law." "Any person" may file a "complaint" regardless of which rights are claimed to have been violated.
According to Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 20, 79 and 93 GG "no one can be prejudiced or favored" by "public authorities" in Germany for any of the reasons which are listed in Article 3 paragraph 3 GG.
According to Articles 1, 19, 20, 79 and 93 GG the jurisdiction to “decide" on the "complaints" of violations of "rights" by "public authorities" has been established in the Bundesverfassungsgericht.
Anyone in a court denied a hearing has been deprived of his or her right to legal recourse. "Public authorities" that deny this human right are Germany's, Europe's and the world's worst enemy.
According to Articles 1, 17, 20, 79, 93, and 101 GG and Articles 1, 13 and 53 ECHR the Bundesverfassungsgericht must "decide" with a judicial decision on each complaint of unconstitutionality.
According to Articles 1, 20, 79, 93, and 101 GG and Articles 1, 13 and 53 ECHR the Bundesverfassungsgericht may not decide to move its juridical obligation to "decide" to an other court or body.
According to Articles 1, 20, 79, 93, and 101 GG and Articles 1, 13 and 53 ECHR the European Court of Human Rights may not make a "decision" in favor of an illegal move (transfer) of jurisdiction.
-
The German people require the three organs of government to act in strict accordance with "the basic principles" specified in Articles 1, 20 and 79 GG, including all of "the basic rights."
Articles 1, 20 paragraph (3) and 79 GG define the German people as a nation. Amendments of "this Basic Law" which affect their true identity are absolutely "inadmissible," i.e., void ab initio.
Amendments of "this Basic Law" that are not subject to "the constitutional order" of Article 20 paragraph (3) GG are, in fact, claims to a "Basic Law" which has not been adopted by the German people.
